Skip to main content
// TOP SECRET //DECLASSIFIED FOR PUBLIC REVIEW// EYES ONLY //
CASE FILESABOUTFAQGET THE APP
← BACK TO ARCHIVE INDEX
DECLASSIFIED
GOVERNMENTSTATUS: PLAUSIBLECASE 1972

Project Stargate: The CIA's Psychic Spy Program

Project Stargate: The CIA's Psychic Spy Program
FIRST REPORTED1972
LOCATIONFORT MEADE, MARYLAND, USA
EVIDENCE ITEMS4 ON FILE
WITNESSES4 DOCUMENTED
CREDIBILITY▮▮▮▮▯ PLAUSIBLE
THE FILEWHAT THE RECORD SAYS
§ 01 — SUMMARY

Declassified CIA program investigating remote viewing for intelligence gathering. Ran for over two decades with mixed results.

§ 02CASE NARRATIVE

From 1972 to 1995, the U.S. government spent over $20 million investigating whether psychics could spy on enemies through remote viewing. Project Stargate began at Stanford Research Institute, studying individuals who claimed to perceive distant locations through extrasensory perception. The program recruited Uri Geller, Pat Price, and Ingo Swann, among others, to remote view Soviet installations and locate hostages. Sessions involved viewers describing target locations sealed in envelopes or coordinates they'd never seen. Some results were remarkably accurate, while others proved completely wrong. The CIA transferred the program to the Defense Intelligence Agency in 1985, where it continued until congressional budget cuts ended it. The American Institutes for Research concluded the program showed no actionable intelligence value, though some participants and researchers disagreed with this assessment.

§ 03 — EVIDENCE ON FILE
EVIDENCE GALLERY
4 ITEMS · SOURCED INDIVIDUALLY BELOW
EV-01 · DOCUMENTJuly 1974

Pat Price Soviet Target Session

A · 1/2
B · 2/2
In 1974, psychic Pat Price provided detailed descriptions of a secret Soviet installation at Semipalatinsk, including specific technical details about underground facilities and construction materials. His remote viewing session, conducted while Price was in California, accurately described aspects of the site that weren't confirmed by U.S. intelligence until satellite imagery became available months later. Price's drawings showed underground structures, unusual building configurations, and even described the crane positioning at the facility with remarkable precision. CIA analysts were reportedly stunned by the accuracy, as some details weren't known to American intelligence at the time of the session. What makes this evidence particularly intriguing is the specificity of technical details that would be nearly impossible to guess randomly. How could Price accurately describe construction materials and facility layouts of a classified installation he'd never seen?
July 1974
SOURCEDeclassified CIA documents
EV-02 · DOCUMENTOctober 1975

Coordinate Remote Viewing Protocols

Stanford Research Institute developed strict double-blind protocols where remote viewers received only random coordinate numbers, with no one present knowing the actual target location until after the session concluded. These procedures were designed to eliminate all conventional information sources and prevent conscious or unconscious cueing. The protocol required viewers to sketch and describe their impressions while monitors recorded everything without feedback. Target locations were selected by computer random number generation, with the actual site verification occurring only after complete documentation. Independent judges later rated the accuracy of sessions against potential targets without knowing which was correct. These rigorous scientific controls make the positive results harder to dismiss as fraud or unconscious bias. Yet critics argue that even double-blind protocols couldn't eliminate all possible conventional explanations for apparent hits.
October 1975
SOURCEStanford Research Institute final report
EV-03 · DOCUMENTSeptember 1995

American Institutes for Research Evaluation

The AIR final assessment concluded that while some statistical anomalies existed in Project Stargate data, the program provided no actionable intelligence value for government operations. Their analysis found that even the most impressive individual sessions failed to produce information useful for actual intelligence purposes. The evaluation team, led by skeptical researchers, acknowledged that certain results exceeded chance expectations but argued this didn't translate to operational effectiveness. They noted that viewers' descriptions were often too vague or general to provide specific intelligence, even when containing some accurate elements. This official conclusion effectively ended government funding, yet it raises questions about the evaluation criteria. Were the standards for "actionable intelligence" too restrictive to recognize genuinely anomalous information gathering?
September 1995
SOURCEAmerican Institutes for Research final report
EV-04 · DOCUMENTAugust 1973

Uri Geller CIA Testing Records

A · 1/3
B · 2/3
C · 3/3
Declassified documents reveal that Uri Geller underwent extensive testing at Stanford Research Institute under controlled conditions, with CIA personnel observing his attempts to demonstrate psychic abilities. The records show mixed results, with some tests producing statistically significant outcomes while others showed no anomalous effects. During one notable session, Geller successfully identified drawings sealed in opaque envelopes with an accuracy rate that evaluators calculated as exceeding chance by significant margins. However, other tests involving metal bending and telepathy showed inconsistent or negative results, leading to debate about the overall reliability of his abilities. Declassified CIA documents show Uri Geller’s attempt (right in the attached images) to copy a drawing using only his psychic powers. These official records provide rare documented evidence of government psychic testing, yet they also highlight the inconsistent nature of reported phenomena. Why would genuine psychic abilities work sometimes but not others under identical controlled conditions?
August 1973
SOURCECIA declassified testing records
THE INVESTIGATIONWHAT WE MAKE OF IT
WITNESS STATEMENT 1 OF 4 · FIRST-HAND ACCOUNT, NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED
March 1995

"We were tasked with determining whether psychic abilities could be used for intelligence gathering, and what we found was that some individuals could indeed perceive distant locations with remarkable accuracy."

Targ served as the primary researcher at Stanford Research Institute during Project Stargate's early years. As a laser physicist with impeccable scientific credentials, his involvement lent credibility to the program. Targ designed many of the double-blind protocols used in remote viewing experiments and personally supervised hundreds of sessions with various psychics. He witnessed both spectacular hits and complete failures, leading him to conclude that while the phenomenon appeared genuine, it remained inconsistent and difficult to control. After the program's termination, Targ continued advocating for remote viewing research and wrote extensively about his experiences.

RUSSELL TARG · PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA
WITNESS STATEMENT 2 OF 4 · FIRST-HAND ACCOUNT, NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED
August 1995

"The evidence for remote viewing is not a question of belief - it's a question of what the data shows, and the data shows clear statistical anomalies that can't be explained by chance alone."

Dr. May directed Project Stargate during its final years at Science Applications International Corporation. With a background in experimental nuclear physics, he brought rigorous scientific methodology to psychic research. May oversaw the transition from informal testing to strict laboratory protocols and maintained detailed statistical records of all sessions. He argued that while individual results varied dramatically, aggregate data revealed consistent patterns exceeding random probability. Following the program's closure, May established the Cognitive Sciences Laboratory to continue remote viewing research in the private sector, insisting that the phenomenon deserved serious scientific investigation despite government skepticism.

EDWIN MAY · PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA
SHOW 2 MORE WITNESS STATEMENTS
WITNESS STATEMENT 3 OF 4 · FIRST-HAND ACCOUNT, NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED
November 1995

"I was just a soldier following orders, but what I experienced during those sessions was unlike anything I'd encountered in twenty years of military service."

Retired Army Chief Warrant Officer McMoneagle served as one of Project Stargate's most prolific remote viewers, participating in hundreds of sessions over nearly two decades. Military personnel considered him highly reliable and level-headed, making his accounts particularly credible to government officials. McMoneagle claimed to have successfully viewed Soviet installations, located missing persons, and described classified facilities with accuracy that surprised even skeptical intelligence analysts. He received the Legion of Merit award partly for his remote viewing contributions, though the specific citation remained classified. After retirement, McMoneagle continued demonstrating his abilities in civilian research programs and wrote several books detailing his experiences.

JOE MCMONEAGLE · FORT MEADE, MARYLAND
WITNESS STATEMENT 4 OF 4 · FIRST-HAND ACCOUNT, NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED
September 1995

"Despite decades of research and millions of dollars spent, proponents have failed to provide a single example of remote viewing that could be used for practical intelligence purposes."

Psychologist Ray Hyman served on the evaluation panel that assessed Project Stargate's effectiveness for the American Institutes for Research. As a prominent skeptic with expertise in experimental design and statistical analysis, Hyman scrutinized the program's methodology and results. He identified numerous flaws in experimental protocols and argued that apparent successes resulted from loose criteria and confirmation bias rather than genuine psychic phenomena. Hyman acknowledged that some results appeared statistically significant but maintained that they lacked practical value for intelligence operations. His critical assessment contributed significantly to the program's termination and continues to influence scientific opinion about remote viewing claims.

RAY HYMAN · EUGENE, OREGON
§ 04 — COMPETING THEORIES

Quantum Consciousness Theory

Physicist Russell Targ and others propose that consciousness operates through quantum mechanics, allowing perception beyond normal sensory limits. This theory suggests the brain functions as a quantum receiver, accessing information through non-local quantum entanglement - the phenomenon where particles remain connected across vast distances.

Quantum consciousness theorists point to experiments where remote viewers accurately described targets before they were randomly selected, seeming to transcend both space and time. They argue consciousness isn't produced by the brain but interfaces with it, explaining how information could be accessed from anywhere in the universe.

Skeptics note that quantum effects typically collapse at the warm, noisy scale of brain neurons. If quantum consciousness were real, why doesn't everyone demonstrate psychic abilities consistently?

Government Disinformation Campaign

Some researchers believe Project Stargate was primarily a psychological warfare operation designed to make Soviet intelligence waste resources investigating psychic phenomena. The CIA allegedly recruited known psychics and stage magicians, deliberately leaking information about the program to enemy agents.

This theory explains why results were inconsistent - genuine psychic research wasn't the goal. Instead, the program served as elaborate misdirection, causing the USSR to divert scientific talent and funding toward paranormal research. Declassified documents show the CIA considered how publicizing psychic programs might affect foreign adversaries.

However, the program's $20 million budget and 23-year duration suggest more than mere disinformation. Would the government maintain such an expensive deception for over two decades without any real research value?

Statistical Anomaly Explanation

Mainstream scientists argue Project Stargate's apparent successes resulted from confirmation bias and statistical manipulation rather than genuine psychic phenomena. Researchers allegedly focused on hits while ignoring numerous misses, creating an illusion of accuracy through selective reporting.

Mathematical analysis suggests that with hundreds of sessions conducted over decades, some remarkable coincidences were inevitable. The human brain excels at finding patterns even in random data, leading both researchers and viewers to perceive meaningful connections where none existed.

Yet independent statistical reviews found some results exceeded chance expectations by significant margins. Even accounting for bias and data mining, certain sessions produced accuracy rates that skeptics struggle to explain through conventional means.

Enhanced Human Intuition

Rather than supernatural psychic powers, some theorists propose remote viewing represents highly developed intuitive abilities that most humans possess but rarely access. This theory suggests intensive training and meditation can unlock latent perceptual capabilities within normal brain function.

Neuroscientists note that the brain continuously processes subliminal sensory information below conscious awareness. Remote viewing training might teach people to access this normally filtered data, creating the appearance of extrasensory perception through enhanced pattern recognition and unconscious inference.

This explanation accounts for why some individuals performed better than others and why results improved with practice. However, it doesn't explain how viewers could accurately describe locations thousands of miles away with no possible sensory input.

Morphic Resonance Field Theory

Biologist Rupert Sheldrake's morphic resonance theory proposes that all systems inherit collective memory from previous similar systems through morphic fields - invisible information structures that connect related phenomena across space and time.

According to this theory, remote viewers tap into morphic fields associated with target locations, accessing accumulated information patterns from everyone who previously experienced those places. The more distinctive or emotionally significant a location, the stronger its morphic field and the easier it becomes to perceive remotely.

While innovative, morphic resonance lacks empirical evidence and faces criticism from mainstream science for being untestable. Critics argue it's pseudoscientific speculation that explains nothing while claiming to explain everything.

§ 05 — VERDICT · PLAUSIBLE
▮▮▮▮▯PLAUSIBLE

Project Stargate definitely existed - thousands of declassified documents confirm this. Whether remote viewing actually works remains hotly debated. Some sessions produced surprisingly accurate results that statisticians say exceed chance, while others were complete failures. The program's 23-year duration suggests officials saw enough promise to continue funding, despite mixed results. Critics argue confirmation bias and loose evaluation criteria inflated success rates. Believers point to specific hits that seemingly couldn't be explained by chance or conventional means. The truth likely lies somewhere between complete fraud and genuine psychic phenomena - perhaps an unknown sensory mechanism science doesn't yet understand.

RELATED FILES